Analysis and Thinking on the Difficulties in the Implementation of Safety Work in State-owned Coal Mines

Careful analysis of several large state-owned coal mine accidents occurred, mainly due to the implementation of safe work does not go, strict management is not up. Some coal mine enterprises' safety production work has not been put into place in real terms. The safety responsibility has not been implemented at the grassroots level, and it has been implemented at all levels of leadership. It has not really grasped the end, but only stayed in the general work arrangement. The responsibility system for safety production and various rules and regulations are not strictly enforced, the requirements are not strict, the management is not strict, the phenomenon of “three violations” is ignored, the form of supervision and inspection is open, and the investigation of those responsible for accidents is not strict, not thorough, and major events Small, small things have changed. The lesson of the five major accidents once again tells us that doing a good job is the key to doing a good job in safety production. Which unit's safety measures have been implemented, and which unit's safety production can be alarmed and sounded safely; otherwise, it is not. However, it is not an easy task to do a good job, and it takes a lot of effort to make a multi-faceted effort. In particular, the implementation of safety work is difficult and difficult. It requires us to repeatedly grasp, often grasp, and constantly grasp it. As long as we grasp it consistently, we must grasp the real effort, stupid effort and hard work, and state-owned coal mines can Safety production is doing well.

At present, the difficulty in implementing safety work seems to be a common problem, and all levels are looking for "prescription" and good strategies. The status quo of safe production tells us that in the practice of safe production, some work is indeed difficult to implement, and some work is easy to implement. These two types of work form a contradiction objectively. In the safe production of coal mines, we must carefully analyze, study and analyze the implementation of safety production. We can find problems with commonalities. For these common problems, we must address the current situation and research countermeasures. In the safety implementation of coal mines, there is a phenomenon of “ten difficulties and ten easy” that deserves our attention and deep thought.

First, the implementation of regular work is difficult, the implementation of the assault work is easy

Regular work is relative to focused, assault work. Regular work, as a large-scale, specific, basic work that needs to be carried out day after day, is time-consuming and labor-intensive, and lacks a sensational effect, so it is easy to be lax and slack. Quality standardization work is the most basic work of coal mine safety production. It needs us to work day after day, month after month, year after year, but because it is a daily and regular basic work, it is better to grasp it. difficult. The difficulty here is not to say that quality standardization can't catch fruit, but it is not so easy to insist on high standards and strict requirements. The task of assault work is urgent, the impact is great, the effect is quick, the leaders pay more attention, and the masses understand. For example, the annual Safe Production Week organized by the organization often yields gratifying results. Anyone who is "short-term, quick-acting" will be willing to organize, implement, and participate. As a key point of the assault work, of course, we must do our best to do a good job, but regular work is related to the foundation and foundation of safe production, and it cannot be ignored at any time. It is a work that must be done from time to time, everywhere, and everything needs to be done with perseverance and consistent efforts. Regular work is basic work. Such work is not done well, there are loopholes, and negligence is often the beginning of losses caused by accidents. Careful analysis of the causes of accidents, mostly in the negligence of regular work.

Second, intangible work is difficult to implement, tangible work is easy to implement

In safety production, some units and leaders have the phenomenon of “heavy tangible, light and intangible, heavy hardware and light software”. The intangible work mentioned here refers to safety education, safety training, lessons learned from accidents, pre-class meetings, etc. These tasks are not convenient for quantitative assessment and are difficult to implement. The tangible work, such as hidden danger investigation, quality compliance, cadre catching three violation indicators, etc., are all visible and tangible, and it is relatively easy to implement the work of using statistical expressions. Tangible work and intangible work, the two are dialectical unity, tangible depends on intangible support, invisible depends on tangible. Therefore, to grasp the tangible work, we must focus on the invisible construction, grasp the invisible work, and pay attention to the reflection through the tangible things. In a certain sense, it is more important to capture intangible work. Because intangible work is often a basic and fundamental task, if it is not well done, tangible work will be difficult to consolidate and develop.

Third, the implementation of hidden dangers after inspection is difficult, the implementation of hidden dangers before inspection

Now organize various types of security checks, often with more advance notices and fewer surprise checks. The result of this is that the unit being inspected has enough time to prepare and cope with the inspection. In order to meet the various inspections of the higher authorities, after receiving the inspection notice, all units must conduct pre-inspection in advance. For the various hidden problems found in the pre-inspection, all units can be quickly rectified and dealt with. The purpose of this is very clear, that is, to achieve good results in the safety inspection. As for the problems and hidden dangers discovered by the formal inspection, the attitude is not as positive as the pre-examination. Although the hidden dangers and problems found in the safety inspections have been implemented "three fixed", but "three fixed" is "three fixed", hidden dangers still exist there, and no one still solves the problem. The reason is mainly because some leaders have problems with their guiding ideology. Leading cadres at all levels must correct the guiding ideology, do a sample before inspection, and use the same method to solve the hidden problems before and during inspection or after inspection.

Fourth, the work that everyone manages is difficult to implement, and the work of clear division of labor is easy to implement.

A job division to a specific department, specific people, it is easy to implement. On the other hand, if the division of labor is unknown, everyone will manage it and it will be difficult to implement the problem. For example, the next winch is used by several units. Everyone only uses it, regardless of maintenance. You rely on me. I look at you. When you find a problem, you use the unit to push me. I push you, talk to each other, and Push responsibility. The crux of the problem is that the responsibility system is not implemented. For the work that everyone has to manage, it is first necessary to clarify which department is responsible for and responsible. On this basis, each department has its own functions and division of labor, so that we can form a joint force and implement it.

5. The work of deputy deployment is difficult to implement, and the work of the decentralized deployment is easy to implement.

For safety work, the executive leader of each unit is the first responsible person for safe production, and the other leaders in charge are working as assistants in the post and under his leadership. As the unit's official and deputy, although their responsibilities in safety production are different, but the purpose is the same, that is, earnestly perform their duties and do a good job in charge of the work. Implement various measures and achieve safe production. In the production process, there is such a phenomenon that should not occur. The same work, because it is the deployment of the official and deputy, the degree of difficulty in implementation is very different. We must educate the broad masses of cadres and employees. As long as it is a work of safe production, whether it is deployed in both the official and deputy positions, we must complete it without compromise and implement it. Only in this way can we manage safety and promote safe production.

6. The implementation of guiding work is difficult, and the implementation of directive work is easy.

Guiding work generally refers to the work that the superior only proposes in principle, and the lower level can flexibly grasp according to the actual situation of the unit. Instructional work refers to the requirements of the order of the superiors proposed by the superior, and the subordinates must work unconditionally. Since the mandated tasks and requirements are very specific, it is not good to do so, so the leadership attaches a high degree of attention, and the implementation is easy, and it is easy to implement. The guiding work is flexible and flexible, and it seems that the relationship is not big. At the same time, in order to implement the guiding work, it is especially necessary to exert subjective initiative and creativity. It is good at combining the instructions of the superior with the actual unit and making it concrete. It is even more difficult to do this. But because of the difficulty, sometimes it is more important. Because many of the major tasks of the superior deployment are instructive, it is not as specific.

Seven, the work without rewards is difficult to implement, and the work with rewards is easy to implement.

Under the conditions of market economy, the introduction of interest-driven mechanism into safety production management, the use of moderation will promote safety management, on the contrary, it will have a negative effect. In the implementation of safety work, because people over-emphasize the interest-driven role, the result is that the work with rewards is easy to implement, and the work without rewards is difficult to implement. Leading cadres at all levels and the broad masses of employees must establish new concepts, safely produce human lives, and implement safety. As long as it is about safety production, whether it is rich or not, we must conscientiously implement it, fully implement it, and put all the work in place.

Eight, the work that is slow to implement is difficult to implement, and the work that is effective is easy to implement.

Some units and leaders focus on the current work, work quickly, ignore long-term work, and work slowly. Generally speaking, slow-acting work is generally basic and fundamental work, such as the development of safety technology and the research and development of new safety technologies. It is not easy to be effective in a short period of time, and it takes a lot of hard work and hard work. Go on. In the safe production, while we are doing our best, we must focus on the long-term, overcome the urgency of quick success, focus on the foundation, and focus on the long-term, and promote the effective and solid implementation of all aspects of safe production.

9. The implementation of old problems is difficult, and the implementation of new problems is easy.

New problems have just been discovered, which can attract people's attention and attention, so it is easier to solve and implement them. Old problems exist for a long time, people have already seen it, and it is necessary to solve the difficulty of one or the other. In this case, it takes a lot of effort to implement it. New problems and the existence of old problems directly threaten safety production. We must solve the old problems as new problems, and we should treat the new problems as things to be done immediately. It is necessary to solve all the problems in safety production in a spirit of contending for the future, and create a relaxed environment for safe production.

X. It is difficult to handle the responsibility of the accident, and it is easy to trace and analyze the accident.

Whenever various types of accidents occur, we must conduct strict investigation, analysis and handling in accordance with the principle of “four not letting go”. Tracing and analyzing accidents, generally organized by the safety supervision department, carried out relatively smoothly. When handling the person responsible for the accident, it is very difficult to determine the handling decision because the handling of the accident involves notification, fines, warnings, downgrades, expulsion of minerals, etc., which involves the vital interests of the responsible person. When dealing with the person responsible for the accident, we must adhere to the principles of openness, fairness, and impartiality, strictly follow the rules, and enforce the law impartially, so that the responsible person responsible for the punishment is convinced.

Use 1

Slave Cylinder EPS

Hydraulic clutches for manual transmissions use brake fluid to supply pressure to disengage the clutch from the engine. Pushing in the clutch pedal makes fluid flow from a master cylinder (or fluid reservoir) to the slave cylinder, which moves the pressure plate, allowing the driver to shift gears.

Seals and hoses can leak, and if enough fluid doesn`t reach the slave cylinder the clutch pedal may go all the way to the floor or the driver may not be able to shift gears. Air can also get into the hydraulic system, causing the clutch pedal to feel spongy. Some slave cylinders are mounted on the outside of a manual transmission, while others are inside the transmission bell housing.

Renault Clutch Cylinder Valve,Man Clutch Slave Cylinder,Iveco Clutch Slave Cylinder,Actuator Eps For Benz

SHANGQIU FLAT WORLD MACHINERY CO.,LTD , https://www.flatworldtrucks.com